Perfume people- you want this don't you? So do I.
Available from
www.ros-shiers.com. This print is £39 which is very reasonable in my opinion. There are lots of other lovely prints available. All are Giclée prints which her site says 'are guaranteed to not fade or age and have a colour life of 75-100 years. The Giclee printing process ensures a print with brilliant colour and razor sharp detail'. The prints also apparently fit in off the shelf frames being 30x 40cm which is fab because with most of the prints I buy the frames cost more than the pictures.
Found via
Daily Candy.
PS. She has a blog too- skip over
here to read.
It really is lovely. :)
ReplyDeleteI have seen that today and had to think of you.
ReplyDeleteThis is gorgeous. You're right, I do want it ;-)
ReplyDeleteOh yes..! I love this, especially the bottles with the puffy-things that spray on the perfume. So elegant, so lovely. What are they called?
ReplyDeleteAnyway, truly beautiful, thanks for sharing!
I'm glad everyone agrees- I really want one but am going to leave ordering until after my holiday.
ReplyDeleteMet Mum- yes it's kind of perfect isn't it!
That is lovely I love the whole look in the top photo x
ReplyDeleteYes those prints are great! I've been having an inkling to buy old posters and prints lately. Giclees are lovely, but only when they're well done and age well! These look great!
ReplyDeleteAnd on your macaroon note: in france, everything tastes better:)
That is gorgeous... would love it our spare room... which is more like my dressing room but dont tell Other Half that! xx
ReplyDeleteHi Wilderness Chic- I know I love the bell jars for perfumes!
ReplyDeleteHi Emily- True, true everything does taste better there!
Hi FNO- I won't tell ;-) and I agree it would be perfect for a second bedroom (dressing room)
I really wanted to have this love potion I like the bottles so cute. :)
ReplyDeletecletsey
Hi WP- thanks for stopping by- yes it's gorgeous isn't it
ReplyDeleteI was looking forward to your next post potion its a good subject to explore.
ReplyDeleteisey